Is McLaren’s first grand tourer just a toned-down supercar, or something more nuanced and special?
Have you got New McLaren fatigue? It seems many people have and it’s fair to say there are times when it feels like a new model or variant is let into the wild from Woking on a weekly basis. Me? I understand the concern of owners over residuals and I also sympathise with the view that it’s hard to be terribly excited about the newest McLaren when there’s likely to be a lighter, faster one along any… second… now. But the flip side is that the sheer turnover of models – all made out of the same pot of ingredients – has honed them to a fine edge. The 600LT is the reigning evo Car of the Year and rightly so. It’s simply brilliant.
But this is a bigger stretch. The new GT is, according to McLaren, a real, proper honest-to-goodness gran turismo. Comfortable, refined, luxurious and probably capable of carrying at least a dozen sets of Golf clubs or several pieces of tailor-made luggage of questionable taste. So can a mid-engined, supercar-shaped car made out of the carbonfibre bones of searing supercars really be a GT? Or is it just a softer, less focused, less exciting supercar?
Engine, transmission and 0-100kmh time
No surprises here. The new GT is powered by the familiar 4-litre twin-turbocharged flat-plane-crank V8, albeit here with a higher compression ratio (9.4:1, up from 8.7:1) for improved torque and a bit less of that crazy 720S top-end power.
The engine, designated M840TE, produces 455kW at 7500rpm and 630Nm from 5500 to 6500rpm, with 90 per cent of that torque output available between 3000 and 7250rpm. It’s hooked up to a seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox. McLaren claims 0-100kmh in 3.1sec, 0-200kmh in 9.0sec and a top speed of 326kmh. Which all sounds very, er, super.
Can you guess? Of course you can. Carbonfibre monocoque (here dubbed MonoCell II-T, the T standing for Touring), aluminium double-wishbone suspension and all that other good stuff. Again… I understand this level of perceived commonality is annoying to some, but taken in isolation it’s hard not to be impressed with the attributes they all contribute towards: a weight of 1530kg (for comparison a DB11 V12 is 1875kg, a 911 Turbo S 1675kg), a suspension system capable of delivering exceptional roll stiffness with superb ride quality, and an incredibly stiff structure to allow precise tuning.
New for the GT is what McLaren calls Proactive Damping Control, which uses sensors to proactively prime the dampers for irregularities in the road surface, softening the ride when required, but without compromising overall body control. The GT does not use the 720S’s hydraulically cross-linked suspension, rather a more traditional combination of coil-springs, adaptive dampers and anti-roll bars.
Perhaps more important for the GT is the much-improved luggage capacity across the front and rear compartments, which amounts to 570 litres; the chasing out of unwanted noise with revised wheelarch liners, NVH material and things such as new seats (thank goodness, as the ‘Comfort’ seats in 570S and 720S are pretty awful); plus superb front-end clearance and a monster 1200W Bowers & Wilkins stereo. Lots of work has been done on engine noise to create a more GT appropriate soundtrack, too.
What’s it like to drive?
Different. No, genuinely. Of course, there’s a lot of familiarity in here. The look and feel, the wonderful view out, the lovely sense of supple agility that always pervades McLarens. However, the engine response is markedly changed and the strong, torquey delivery makes for effortless progress without the sheer unhinged lunacy of something like a 720S or even a 600LT. Its effective, addictive even, but there’s a quieter, more grown-up vibe. Allied to a remarkably calm, spookily supple ride and the more measured steering response, the overall effect is that the GT remains quite obviously a McLaren but one with a calmer, more subtle personality. I won’t pretend I don’t miss the laser precision of the 720S, but I suppose most GT owners won’t be jumping between the two.
It trickles through town easily, the brake actuation is smoother, road noise is soothed away (to be replaced by some suspension noise, but I guess you’re always chasing something) and on the French autoroute it’s an extremely civilised place to be. Does it tick all the GT boxes? Perhaps it lacks the bruising, indomitable, relentless feel of something front-engined and heavyweight. But in terms of actual capabilities, it’s on the money.
So, away from the autoroutes do those supercar genes elevate it as a driver’s car, too? Initially the answer is a bit of a surprising ‘no’. On the faster sweepers of the Route Napoleon the GT feels fluid, fast and pretty nimble, but there’s no question it lacks the tactility and sweet, lightweight feel of a 570S. As with other McLarens you can adjust the Powertrain and Handling settings with two rotary switches to select Comfort, Sport or Track mode, but here the set-ups are considerably backed-off. For the suspension, Comfort feels slightly floaty, disconnected and the body control just isn’t tight enough. Fair enough.
Sport mode is much more like it, but even so, there’s a slight disconnect between input and action and nothing like the unerring accuracy of other McLarens. Much to the annoyance of the dynamics guys I ended up driving quite a lot in Track mode, just to sharpen everything as much as possible. To be fair, these French roads were extremely smooth and on the few lumpy sections Sport felt much more dialled-in.
In the tighter stuff the GT occasionally groans under the weight of 1530kg. Literally in the case of the brakes. Our test car didn’t have the optional ceramics and the standard system is right on the limit of what’s acceptable for such a quick car. The pedal goes long pretty quickly and doesn’t come back for some time. And boy do the front tyres get a workout! The GT just doesn’t have the crispness of turn-in you’d expect and can understeer a surprising amount if you start really going hard.
However, it’s also extremely difficult to look at the GT’s shape, hardware and badge and not judge it as a supercar, pure and simple. Maybe that’s unfair. The GT is meant to be a, um, GT and so expecting 720S levels of grip and control is unrealistic. Is it sharper, more composed and more fun than a DB11 AMR? I’d say so, yes. And whilst that slightly softer body control makes for a calmer, less frenzied and less precise gait it also provides quite amazing progression. Once you’ve learnt to give the front tyres a fighting chance on turn-in and got the engine on boost, the GT can be made to slip and slide in almost slow-motion. Small, efficient slides or big, smoky monsters for the cameras – the GT can do it all.
In the end, how you judge the GT is a question of philosophy. If you think a grand tourer is front-engined and all about big, muscular character then this thing is not for you. However, I came to enjoy its mix of restrained supercar aesthetic, fluid dynamics and ultra progressive handling balance. If they could knock back a bit of the understeer, tighten up the body control just a shade… Yeah, the development guys groaned when I said the GT S should be great, too. Jethro Bovingdon